|
rock em & roll |
Now I see the thread over on Rock em & Roll Em. This issue is trickier, because posts on boards are not easy to compare, sometimes are written in a less than clear way, sometimes by people not used to sharing credit, and may disappear after a while. Scientific papers, on the other hand, have to get past reviewers, and typically have dozens of references, and are permanently archived when done. People just have to do their best to be upfront about their sources, and it's good to establish favorable reputations by mind mannered and generous behavior. Follow Ups: ● Re: rock em & roll - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 13:37:49 - 5/23/2006 (37237) (1) ● rock em & roll - John Vidale 14:20:12 - 5/23/2006 (37240) (2) ● Re: rock em & roll - Glen 05:09:17 - 5/24/2006 (37265) (1) ● Re: rock em & roll - Thank You - Petra 10:15:52 - 5/24/2006 (37273) (1) ● Re: rock em & roll - Thank You - Cathryn 23:48:52 - 5/24/2006 (37328) (1) ● Re: rock em & roll - Thank You - Roger Hunter 07:01:45 - 5/25/2006 (37342) (1) ● Re: rock em & roll - Thank You - Cathryn 10:16:51 - 5/25/2006 (37354) (0) ● Thanks John (N/T) - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 15:44:54 - 5/23/2006 (37249) (1) ● Re: Thanks John (N/T) - Glen 17:31:45 - 5/23/2006 (37251) (0) ● Appreciated - Glen 01:00:46 - 5/23/2006 (37199) (1) ● The Cut Throat Flip Side - Petra 10:19:17 - 5/23/2006 (37213) (1) ● Re: The Cut Throat Flip Side - Glen 11:45:30 - 5/23/2006 (37215) (1) ● Re: The Cut Throat Flip Side - Petra 12:18:55 - 5/23/2006 (37216) (0) |
|