|
Re: have to side with the moderator |
Exactly! Censorship of vocabulary isn't censorship of perspective. Especially when the words in question are considered profanity, the stuff one wouldn't think lends itself to critical impact in one's meaning. Example: The cow jumped off the moon. The meaning is sooo changed! Which version would you rather read? I do think it is a shame that it has to be used because of abuses by some posters here, but I tend to think the results would be more positive. This really isn't the EQ swearing board. If this is what it takes to avoid insulting others, directly or accidently, I am all for it. (my one cent!) Follow Ups: ● Re: have to side with the moderator - Russell 10:11:44 - 4/25/2006 (36607) (2) ● offending Christians - chris in suburbia 08:27:44 - 4/27/2006 (36637) (1) ● Re: offending Christians - Russell 13:05:49 - 4/27/2006 (36643) (0) ● Re: have to side with the moderator - PennyB 10:30:03 - 4/25/2006 (36609) (2) ● Re: have to side with the moderator - Canie 20:51:44 - 4/25/2006 (36619) (0) ● He meant the homonym for dam - John Vidale 10:45:33 - 4/25/2006 (36610) (1) ● Re: He meant the homonym for dam - Jim W. 09:26:45 - 4/27/2006 (36638) (1) ● Re: He meant the homonym for dam - Joan Chesleigh-Blaine 12:53:57 - 4/27/2006 (36642) (0) |
|