Re: Coyote Creek, Ocotillo Wells
Posted by glen on April 11, 2006 at 23:51:07:

Hello Russell,

I think you're on to my thinking. I have provided a simple map of the region which shows the basic direction of deformation. The area I am intersted in is where the SAF changes from transform into a spreading zone in the Imperial Valley. What I found in the quake records were large quakes near the Mendocino Triple Junction and Northern Cal which are follwed by large quakes in the Imperial Valley. The most notorious was the San Fransico Great quake, which was followed by a strong quake near Imperial. Many of the large Mendocino incidents are followed within a year by a quake in Imperial. When a tranform section of a fault strains, how would a connected transform section react? And would such a region be more suseptable to reactivity? Those are the questions. If we have a strong quake in the Imperial Valley by summer, it would be one more to add to the list. Mendocino went last June 14. I do have to go over the numbers and dates again. Work in progress.

glen



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Coyote Creek, Ocotillo Wells - Russell  08:26:47 - 4/12/2006  (36300)  (1)
        ● Euler Poles? Earth Scientist Needed - glen  10:01:41 - 4/12/2006  (36301)  (1)
           ● not a 2-D problem - John Vidale  11:37:20 - 4/12/2006  (36304)  (2)
              ● Re: not a 2-D problem - Russell  12:44:34 - 4/12/2006  (36306)  (0)
              ● Re: not a 2-D problem - glen  12:39:11 - 4/12/2006  (36305)  (1)
                 ● another nasty complexity - John Vidale  14:12:33 - 4/12/2006  (36307)  (0)