Re: Latest on Don's predictions
Posted by chris in suburbia on March 12, 2006 at 13:02:06:

Roger...the following sentence needs (a lot of) explanation:
"Further checking showed that the years I was using for probability (1997-2001) contained several large quakes with too many aftershocks to cancel out, giving false answers."

Also...you have been back and forth over the months on evaluating Don's predictions...from way better than chance to chance. So, I don't know what to make of any of this. But, I suppose it does not matter whether I don't know if Don's method/ "the data" work...because I'm not in a position to do anything with this...
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Latest on Don's predictions - Roger Hunter  13:21:59 - 3/12/2006  (34728)  (0)