|
For Don, JDF 103 |
Hello Don, Other boards are getting crowded. As for the parallel 103 and the JDF I would propose to get a 90 day background rate of seismicity in the Vancouver Island area and see if it picks up in response to the Banda Sea incident. But I would also have to do a comparative analysis of the Sumatra 9 and 8.7, and other 7+ events to see if increased seismicity is due to the parallel nature of the FFA ring. The 9+ Sumatra did not parallel the JDF between 102 and 106. I need to establish a control group of data to truly judge it. Let me look at the Canadian data and I will get back. This will take some time, but I will spend the time to look at it. Thanks, Maps of study region; British Columbia Vancouver Island USGS- Northwest
Follow Ups: ● FFA map for 7.7? - chris in suburbia 16:24:29 - 1/27/2006 (33210) (1) ● Re: FFA map for 7.7? - glen 17:10:36 - 1/27/2006 (33215) (1) ● Re: FFA map for 7.7? - Don in Hollister 18:33:03 - 1/27/2006 (33218) (1) ● Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 20:39:31 - 1/27/2006 (33222) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - chris in suburbia 05:22:05 - 1/28/2006 (33225) (2) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 16:58:19 - 1/29/2006 (33253) (0) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 14:50:11 - 1/29/2006 (33250) (2) ● Thanks Cathryn. n/t - Roger Hunter 18:59:59 - 1/29/2006 (33257) (0) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 17:03:54 - 1/29/2006 (33254) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 18:05:09 - 1/29/2006 (33255) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 07:54:22 - 1/31/2006 (33271) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 14:18:11 - 1/31/2006 (33274) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 16:30:41 - 1/31/2006 (33301) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 19:27:48 - 1/31/2006 (33302) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 07:57:48 - 2/1/2006 (33307) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 15:05:29 - 2/1/2006 (33311) (0) |
|