For Don, JDF 103
Posted by glen on January 27, 2006 at 13:54:39:

Hello Don,

Other boards are getting crowded. As for the parallel 103 and the JDF I would propose to get a 90 day background rate of seismicity in the Vancouver Island area and see if it picks up in response to the Banda Sea incident. But I would also have to do a comparative analysis of the Sumatra 9 and 8.7, and other 7+ events to see if increased seismicity is due to the parallel nature of the FFA ring. The 9+ Sumatra did not parallel the JDF between 102 and 106. I need to establish a control group of data to truly judge it. Let me look at the Canadian data and I will get back. This will take some time, but I will spend the time to look at it.

Thanks,
glen

Maps of study region;

British Columbia
http://www.pgc.nrcan.gc.ca/seismo/recent/bc.50evt.html

Vancouver Island
http://www.pgc.nrcan.gc.ca/seismo/recent/swbc.50evt.html

USGS- Northwest
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Maps/US10/42.52.-130.-120.html


Follow Ups:
     ● FFA map for 7.7? - chris in suburbia  16:24:29 - 1/27/2006  (33210)  (1)
        ● Re: FFA map for 7.7? - glen  17:10:36 - 1/27/2006  (33215)  (1)
           ● Re: FFA map for 7.7? - Don in Hollister  18:33:03 - 1/27/2006  (33218)  (1)
              ● Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  20:39:31 - 1/27/2006  (33222)  (1)
                 ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - chris in suburbia  05:22:05 - 1/28/2006  (33225)  (2)
                    ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  16:58:19 - 1/29/2006  (33253)  (0)
                    ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  14:50:11 - 1/29/2006  (33250)  (2)
                       ● Thanks Cathryn. n/t - Roger Hunter  18:59:59 - 1/29/2006  (33257)  (0)
                       ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  17:03:54 - 1/29/2006  (33254)  (1)
                          ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  18:05:09 - 1/29/2006  (33255)  (1)
                             ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:54:22 - 1/31/2006  (33271)  (1)
                                ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  14:18:11 - 1/31/2006  (33274)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  16:30:41 - 1/31/2006  (33301)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  19:27:48 - 1/31/2006  (33302)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:57:48 - 2/1/2006  (33307)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  15:05:29 - 2/1/2006  (33311)  (0)