|
more specific? |
Cathyryn, Canie, I'm not sure exactly what Canie's theory is....Canie..you may have said but I forget. Can you be specific? As for evidence of this....once I know what the theory is, might be a good time to get Roger to do a couple of graphs so we can see if it is real or imagined, and if it looks real, whether it is a strong or weak effect. It's pretty easy for it to look like there is something...when it need not be significant...after a Gulf of California quake maybe you just notice the southern California quake (or whatever...) Follow Ups: ● Strike-slip Quake - Don in Hollister 13:49:53 - 1/4/2006 (32620) (1) ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North - Petra 18:20:23 - 1/4/2006 (32624) (1) ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North - Cathryn 14:16:29 - 1/5/2006 (32633) (1) ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North - Canie 18:33:06 - 1/5/2006 (32637) (2) ● Canie's relation...Roger? - chris in suburbia 05:14:53 - 1/6/2006 (32640) (1) ● Re: Canie's relation...Roger? - Roger Hunter 13:01:38 - 1/6/2006 (32643) (1) ● Chris, want to see? - Roger Hunter 14:28:14 - 1/6/2006 (32648) (1) ● Re: Chris, want to see? - chris in suburbia 13:21:26 - 1/7/2006 (32649) (0) ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North ; PS: - Canie 19:45:34 - 1/5/2006 (32638) (1) ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North ; PS: - Mary Antonelli 14:15:39 - 1/6/2006 (32646) (0) |
|