more specific?
Posted by chris in suburbia on January 04, 2006 at 12:29:13:

Cathyryn, Canie, I'm not sure exactly what Canie's theory is....Canie..you may have said but I forget. Can you be specific? As for evidence of this....once I know what the theory is, might be a good time to get Roger to do a couple of graphs so we can see if it is real or imagined, and if it looks real, whether it is a strong or weak effect. It's pretty easy for it to look like there is something...when it need not be significant...after a Gulf of California quake maybe you just notice the southern California quake (or whatever...)
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Strike-slip Quake - Don in Hollister  13:49:53 - 1/4/2006  (32620)  (1)
        ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North  - Petra  18:20:23 - 1/4/2006  (32624)  (1)
           ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North  - Cathryn  14:16:29 - 1/5/2006  (32633)  (1)
              ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North  - Canie   18:33:06 - 1/5/2006  (32637)  (2)
                 ● Canie's relation...Roger? - chris in suburbia  05:14:53 - 1/6/2006  (32640)  (1)
                    ● Re: Canie's relation...Roger? - Roger Hunter  13:01:38 - 1/6/2006  (32643)  (1)
                       ● Chris, want to see? - Roger Hunter  14:28:14 - 1/6/2006  (32648)  (1)
                          ● Re: Chris, want to see? - chris in suburbia  13:21:26 - 1/7/2006  (32649)  (0)
                 ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North ; PS: - Canie   19:45:34 - 1/5/2006  (32638)  (1)
                    ● Re: Strike-slip Quake - Look Further North ; PS: - Mary Antonelli  14:15:39 - 1/6/2006  (32646)  (0)