One thing I wanted to throw in on your characterization of this page is that everybody posting here is not using human sensitivity. I am one of those not using human sensitivity in this capacity.

My predictions/warnings/advisories are totally based on EM phenomena. Nothing else. As you might have seen on a previous post I can't get into what these devices are or what they consist of.

One of the reasons for my silence I've already given in a previous post. Another reason, which I haven't mentioned before, is based on the visit to Jack Coles by Dr. Anthony Fraser-Smith of Stanford and Andy Michael of the USGS. They totally debunked his ideas based on preconceived notions. Hence, the way that I want to do this is to get to the point of being consistently statistically significant that is recognized by the scientific community before I even think of revealing what it is that I am using. I don't want to get into the position of being defeated before I even get started.

Dennis