Shan's 8M Prediction
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on November 20, 2005 at 14:46:56:

Hi Glen,

Thank for your comments and here is my explanation.

Actually, it was a lesson for me to stick on to my own principle and not to listen others
after the 8.3M March 05 prediction.

Usually I am taking readings on a plain wall for the whole year (some times it exceeds to
the next year on the same wall). While doing so, it is good as well as bad to derive the
prediction since it is making confusion if we move on the previous year track but at the same
time we can get some clues like whether we are stick on the same track or not etc. Also some
days due to lack of infrastructural facility at my home I constrained to take readings on the
same wall in a different location subject to available sunshine on a particular period. So if
you see the tracks on a later days it is difficult to identify properly unless put some hint
on the tracks.

Actually March 21st when the actual readings were taken was the intersecting period on the
track; interestingly having the same day but couple of months back. Initially I have announced
the 8.3M quake based on my readings which I have took correct. Later I have received the expert's
opinion that never such quake occurs in the short period, as I reported in the board earlier.
After seeing such statements I went to analysis the track and I took the reference of the
intersecting day date of old month as new one and based on that I revised it as around 5M after
getting confused. Accordingly I posted in this board also. But after seeing the result, I got a
good lesson that be on my own stand and never listen to others experience and also strongly felt
that to make a pucca track with proper identity of days during such intersecting periods.

Though it was real pain at that time, I do not want to hurt the experts by narrating my experience,
in the Board. But I thank God for gave me 2 such opportunities (9.3 and 8.3M) to register the earth
movements which are rare events before great quakes.

Please note that I suspect the change in magnitude of the incoming Honshu quake between 7 to 8M
instead of 6 to 7M as reported earlier in the board and in my site (now reported ACCORDINGLY),
based on the earth movement. Hope this CHANGE is acceptable for normal people who understand
better. But I cannot do anything for other's baseless arguments since I have no time.

Shan


Follow Ups:
     ● You Change Walls? - glen  17:42:01 - 11/20/2005  (30816)  (2)
        ● Re: You Change Walls? - R.Shanmugasundaram  01:53:31 - 11/21/2005  (30836)  (2)
           ● Appreciated, Shan - glen  10:32:30 - 11/21/2005  (30862)  (0)
           ● Super Secret Sun Shadow Franchise - Ara  07:50:46 - 11/21/2005  (30841)  (1)
              ● Ara, That was Uncalled for... - glen  10:36:51 - 11/21/2005  (30863)  (1)
                 ● Very very called for  - Ara  21:01:30 - 11/21/2005  (30890)  (1)
                    ● Re: Very very called for  - glen  00:46:41 - 11/22/2005  (30895)  (0)
        ● Yet Another Revised Shan Prediction - Ara  20:31:58 - 11/20/2005  (30820)  (0)
     ● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - Don in Hollister  15:19:11 - 11/20/2005  (30815)  (1)
        ● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - R.Shanmugasundaram  01:40:56 - 11/21/2005  (30833)  (0)