Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying
Posted by Roger Hunter on November 19, 2005 at 06:23:21:

Ara;

Interesting question. He normally uses a 3 degree range but the prediction specifies a 220 km range.

Does he mean a 220km radius around his point, as would be expected, or something else?

And don't forget the extra magnitude limits he implies.

I'd say his chances of a hit are pretty good and pretty meaningless.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Ara  20:15:20 - 11/19/2005  (30750)  (1)
        ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter  21:10:15 - 11/19/2005  (30753)  (0)
     ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen  12:52:46 - 11/19/2005  (30734)  (1)
        ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter  13:54:23 - 11/19/2005  (30735)  (1)
           ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen  16:39:12 - 11/19/2005  (30737)  (2)
              ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter  17:03:52 - 11/19/2005  (30740)  (1)
                 ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen  18:16:26 - 11/19/2005  (30743)  (1)
                    ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter  18:40:41 - 11/19/2005  (30745)  (1)
                       ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Don in Hollister  18:54:14 - 11/19/2005  (30746)  (1)
                          ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter  19:46:26 - 11/19/2005  (30749)  (0)
              ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Don in Hollister  16:59:38 - 11/19/2005  (30738)  (0)