I have to agree with Chris on this. I can see Shans' site, but I cannot see the sunshine in India, Pakistan or Nepal. If he would give some weather data on this it would be helpful. I am not saying that his methodolgy is wrong, but it cannot be repeated by others in different locations. I do not KNOW what he sees.

When I made the Alaska projection, I used data that was available to anybody and everybody who had internet access. I saw patterns of earthquakes in Alaska that originated from the USGS data available to all. My interpretation was subjective, but the data was, and is, objective. I also used the possibility of orbital position as a possible factor in the projection. This data was ascertained by well established data from the US Naval Observatory, available to anybody. I used historical data from USGS and NOAA on historical earthquake
occurence. Again, my interpretation was subjective, but the data set does not lie, nor does it change.

I think that anybody who tries earthquake prediction should present fully verifiable evidence for the prediction. The prediction methodology should be repeatable many times by others. I have looked at a ton of predictions, but the best ones are based on verifiable, repeatable data. Let us agree on what the data should be, and then let those who wish to do so get with it. Ear tones, head dizziness and hemorhoids don't cut it. If Shan knows something I don't, then he should let me know the physics of it. What is it that he observes beyond simple shadows? I will study his site more. He has been predicting this quake.

glen