Re: Let's Give Shan Some Credit For Prediction the 7.6 in India
Posted by Petra on October 08, 2005 at 23:10:48:

Glen,

I'm sorry if ear tones don't cut it for you, but they cut it for a lot of people, both men and women who have them daily and report them to me daily. They are regular people, not extraordinary, just people who pay attention to an experience that thousands have all over the world.

Mettler's 5.1 quake this year was reported in advance by the majority of my group (8 at the time) of which none of them heard the sound at the same time and most of them not on the same date either. But their sounds matched in distance and the volume reports matched for the size of the earthquake which arrived. The material is verifyable by everyone in the group.

The data receivers as I like to call them are in various places in CA and New Mexico.

The bottom line is that Shan has his program and he sets his own parameters and if he wants to call a quake a hit, then it's his whether we agree or don't.

As you are probably aware there is a group in Oregon who has some kind of a program which predicts quakes ten years in advance; but the problem is that they don't tell anyone in the public these quakes are going to happen. So while it looks good in the lab it won't do anything for anyone. That doesn't work for me either.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Let's Give Shan Some Credit For Prediction the 7.6 in India - glen  00:01:33 - 10/9/2005  (29140)  (1)
        ● Re: Let's Give Shan Some Credit For Prediction the 7.6 in India - Petra  01:33:47 - 10/9/2005  (29141)  (0)