Re: 7.3 at New Britain
Posted by Roger Hunter on September 09, 2005 at 12:50:05:

Shan;

Do you have more than one website? The one I was looking at had nothing more recent than June 2005.

Anyway, the 7.3 is a good hit although you did not specify the range in the prediction. Still, I know you include 3 degrees on all sides.

It appears to me that all you do is specify half a dozen seismic areas nearly every day with a 7.5 day window, so you're bound to get some hits. The question is whether you do better than chance and your method makes evaluating that nearly impossible.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  09:39:42 - 9/10/2005  (28155)  (1)
        ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  11:33:07 - 9/10/2005  (28161)  (1)
           ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  00:58:35 - 9/11/2005  (28163)  (1)
              ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  08:15:12 - 9/11/2005  (28166)  (1)
                 ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  04:23:20 - 9/12/2005  (28185)  (0)