|
Re: 7.3 at New Britain |
Shan; Do you have more than one website? The one I was looking at had nothing more recent than June 2005. Anyway, the 7.3 is a good hit although you did not specify the range in the prediction. Still, I know you include 3 degrees on all sides. It appears to me that all you do is specify half a dozen seismic areas nearly every day with a 7.5 day window, so you're bound to get some hits. The question is whether you do better than chance and your method makes evaluating that nearly impossible. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 09:39:42 - 9/10/2005 (28155) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 11:33:07 - 9/10/2005 (28161) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 00:58:35 - 9/11/2005 (28163) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 08:15:12 - 9/11/2005 (28166) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 04:23:20 - 9/12/2005 (28185) (0) |
|