Re: 7.3 at New Britain
Posted by Roger Hunter on September 10, 2005 at 11:33:07:

Shan;

> Whatever precursor which I am receiving daily, I converted in to locations and post them against magnitude wise. As I told earlier single precursor yield two separate quakes in two different locations with different magnitude based on what I have presumed that some channels inside the earth in such a way to release the stress to Earth's crust.

Doubtful that such channels actually exist.

> Since I have registering lot of precursors daily but unable to put into computer for future comparison due to lack of time. Once it is stream lined with team work, it will come into act with more accuracy. Then more Rogers will evaluate my work easily.

Very good. I look forward to it. For such purposes be advised that it is most important to keep your predictions exactly as posted, reliably dated and entirely separate from any comments or information added after the fact. The form Canie has provided is ideal.

If I can assist in programming, please let me know.

Another thing of importance is replication. Any valid hypothesis should stand up to replication by others using your methods. This of course will not happen as long as you keep everything secret.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  00:58:35 - 9/11/2005  (28163)  (1)
        ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  08:15:12 - 9/11/2005  (28166)  (1)
           ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  04:23:20 - 9/12/2005  (28185)  (0)