Re: how long is long..both
Posted by Roger Hunter on September 07, 2005 at 12:16:30:

Chris;

The long delays are unfortunately typical.

One of my papers was a rebuttal which was sent to the author of the paper being rebutted for his comments. He proceeded to sit on it for around a year before the journal editor pried it out of him.

The internet can be too fast, as some of my recent posts have shown. It's too easy to go off half-cocked, a failing of mine.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: how long is long..both - Ummm??? - Petra  18:00:00 - 9/7/2005  (28043)  (1)
        ● Re: how long is long..both - Ummm??? - Roger Hunter  18:22:45 - 9/7/2005  (28044)  (2)
           ● Ok, So What's The Attraction? - Petra  19:52:04 - 9/7/2005  (28047)  (1)
              ● brainstorming - chris in suburbia  03:42:30 - 9/8/2005  (28053)  (1)
                 ● Re: brainstorming - Canie  09:01:29 - 9/8/2005  (28061)  (1)
                    ● Don't you mean synergy? n/t - Roger Hunter  18:52:14 - 9/8/2005  (28088)  (1)
                       ● Re: Don't you mean synergy? n/t - Canie  07:59:56 - 9/9/2005  (28098)  (0)
           ● that's "bureaucratic" - Roger Hunter  18:27:16 - 9/7/2005  (28045)  (2)
              ● Re: that's "bureaucratic" - Canie  08:58:54 - 9/8/2005  (28060)  (0)
              ● Re: that's "bureaucratic" - Don in Hollister  01:25:36 - 9/8/2005  (28052)  (0)