Re: RESULTS
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 30, 2005 at 17:10:45:

Shan;

A perfect example of why I find your predictions unacceptable.

You post a date range, an undefined area and a size range.

Then you claim a hit on anything that is remotely close.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Got the point but system to be tuned  - R.Shanmugasundaram  02:47:13 - 8/31/2005  (27862)  (2)
        ● Re: Got the point but system to be tuned  - Roger Hunter  07:05:29 - 8/31/2005  (27864)  (1)
           ● Re: Got the point but system to be tuned  - R.Shanmugasundaram  08:48:04 - 8/31/2005  (27867)  (1)
              ● Re: Got the point but system to be tuned  - Roger Hunter  08:24:45 - 9/1/2005  (27914)  (1)
                 ● Re: Got the point but system to be tuned  - R.Shanmugasundaram  02:27:17 - 9/2/2005  (27930)  (0)
        ● Re: Got the point  - Ara  03:52:22 - 8/31/2005  (27863)  (1)
           ● Need explanation - R.Shanmugasundaram  08:04:53 - 8/31/2005  (27865)  (1)
              ● Need explanation - Ara  07:09:29 - 9/1/2005  (27913)  (1)
                 ● Explanation - R.Shanmugasundaram  11:07:29 - 9/1/2005  (27915)  (1)
                    ● Re: Explanation - Ara  06:42:52 - 9/2/2005  (27935)  (1)
                       ● Re: Explanation - R.Shanmugasundaram  03:23:04 - 9/3/2005  (27945)  (0)