Re: For the record, he denied it eventually
Posted by Canie on July 05, 2005 at 20:31:44:

And that's why we have a somewhat secure one here...

I try to not ever say 'bad' things about Berkland's predictions - but my opinion of them is not high.. He's got the same basic prediction every month - sometimes 2x a month - one for each full or new moon... and then when one hits... its' a 'hit'... I think there is some statistical evidence around saying that there might be a bit more quakes during those times, but it's not enough to be statistically important. It just seems if you have 50% or better of the days covered for quakes in the most active tectonic areas, then you'll get hits...

Canie


Follow Ups:
     ● intriguing stuff - John Vidale  09:25:49 - 7/7/2005  (26843)  (0)