|
|
|
|
| should I "qualify" your predictions |
There was a false tsunami warning reported yesterday in India...10,000 people evacuated, abandoning rescue/cleanup records. The original source of the "information" for that tsunami warning MAY HAVE BEEN a website in Oregon (I heard it reported that the source was that or something else...they were not sure). So, my question to this page, is that if Petra posts her vision for an earth day tsunami in Japan, or a 7.4 in L.A. that I should post a qualification right below her post...mentioning her Parkfield prediction perhaps but that otherwise I saw no reason to take her visions too seriously...from what she has posted in the past here. I would probably make such a post. I'm not saying that Petra should not make her posts...just that someone else needs to balance it. Follow Ups: ● Re: should I "qualify" your predictions - Cathryn 03:00:04 - 1/1/2005 (24169) (1) ● Tim - chris in suburbia 06:14:20 - 1/1/2005 (24174) (0) ● can't regulate everything - John Vidale 06:17:00 - 12/31/2004 (24135) (2) ● Hamlet - Cathryn 03:35:20 - 1/1/2005 (24170) (2) ● 4 aces odds - Roger Hunter 09:03:56 - 1/1/2005 (24192) (1) ● 1 in 270725 - John Vidale 09:47:43 - 1/1/2005 (24195) (1) ● Re: 1 in 270725 - Roger Hunter 16:08:31 - 1/1/2005 (24204) (0) ● Re: Hamlet - chris in suburbia 06:55:20 - 1/1/2005 (24178) (0) ● didn't come from here - John Vidale 08:43:06 - 12/31/2004 (24141) (1) ● Wait A Minute - Petra 12:48:59 - 12/31/2004 (24149) (2) ● Re: Wait A Minute - chris in suburbia 14:43:19 - 12/31/2004 (24153) (0) ● what's his evidence? - John Vidale 13:41:01 - 12/31/2004 (24150) (0) ● Re: should I "qualify" your predictions - Petra 05:59:19 - 12/31/2004 (24133) (0) |
|
|
|
|
