PREDICTION - What think you of this? Came in today's email. I am still feeling "earthquakey"
Posted by Cathryn Alpert on December 20, 2004 at 23:11:33:

Magnitude:
From: Cathryn Alpert - To:
Location: Cathryn Alpert
Top Latitude: Cathryn - Bottom Latitude:
Right Longitude: - Left Longitude:

The first set of main signals were for Northern California to Washington State. The second set of main signals were for Oregon to Alaska. This forecast is in effect immediately extending through January 3, 2005. A more specific epicenter may be determined upon further data received from additional main signals. If such data is received, than at that time, the location and percentage of certainty will be adjusted accordingly.

Currently the percentage of probability is 63% that a quake will occur in these locations specified with a magnitude measuring M6.0 or greater if offshore. The most likely dates are: today, December 21st, 26th or January 2nd with the with the last day of this forecast being the January 3, 2005; plus or minus 9 to 15 hours towards sunrise/sunset. Additional main signals could result in the release of seismic activity before these most probable dates noted above.

Jack Coles will continue to monitor the situation and provide any news and/or updates as they develop. If you live in earthquake country it is extremely important to be prepared in case of an emergency!

Jack would like to remind people to Be prepared not scared. Stock up on items you would need in case of an emergency. There are many wonderful websites including this one, http://www.syzygyjob.net/ which contains suggestions and recommendations of what you need to do to get prepared in the event of an emergency. If youire not quite sure, just ask, there plenty of many people who would be more than happy to assist you. A little prevention now can make all the difference in the world in the event of an emergency.

All we want to do is save livesi Jack Coles

For References See: AP Wire Service January 17-19th, 1994, Hard Copy, American Journal (Inside Edition January 19, 1994) and the L.A. Weekly News; The Myth of Solid Groundi April 9-16th, 1999 top of page 34; the Thurston Clarkis book "California Fault" see pages 254-258 and 397-398; along with many other publications for television, radio, and newspaper from Canada to Japan down to Columbia; nationwide in the United States.

---------------------------------


Coles Method Of Detecting Earthquakes
[Simplified]
There are two types of earthquake signals, Initiali build-up and Main signals that are seismic events in progress that result in earthquakes as much as 90% of the time. Initial Signalsi are build-up types of indicators and may be compared to a rumbling or elevated background noise from the earth normal two to twelve hertz of the sudden lack of sound coming from normal rotation of this sphere we live on. These Initial Signals eventually have yielded quakes approximately 5-to-15% of the time depending on the area and is followed by a main signal as much as 90% of the time with larger quakes. These could and most of the time takes months or years. This could be a iget readyi warning stage. A long period of initial signals with a sudden change could be an indication to get set and when the Main Signal hits that would be go. This is the time interval that one starts to pay extreme attention. Even so, Initial Signals by themselves are still good for about 5-to-15% of the forecast. Main Signals are the detections of the earth as it sparks as a beacon flaring radio noise and sometimes travels around the globe. These are the signals which give us the most likely possible dates, times, location(s), and magnitudes. They happen at one day (four-to-twenty four hours 1x1), four days (fifty six-to-ninety six hours 2x2), nine day (3x3), sixteen day (4x4), etc. At 1x1, 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, etc. those most likeliest dates have occurred on 1,4,9,16 days and only three quakes that have gone 25 days with three that have taken 28 to 30 days (see eruption cycle at Mt. Saint Helens); this could be due to a lunar cycle. On January 21, 1994 twenty-one main signals occurred and it took 361 days for the quake to happen at Kobe, Japan on January 16, 1995. (19x19) Before the quake there was also four day, nine and sixteen day signals. These signals can be picked up on a SPECTRUM ANALYZER. This could be likened to a pencil under pressure sounding off with no visible signs of cracking. Matter of fact, most all-solid objects under stress will sound off before apparent cracking or breaking occurs. More so, quartz crystal sends off radio noise (piezoelectricity) just before breakage despite Nay Sayers that profess that it isn't so! (See Nova, "Are we Alone?", Colorado Department of Mine segment). Also it may be brought to our attention that some rocks decay and are radioactive for tens of thousands of years. Who says that radio noise does not come out of rock? Some of the brightest and deadliest radio waves come from small orb made from rock and put under explosive pressure making nuclear pulse; the Atom bomb. An example of a final main signal would be 2:57 A.M. Friday the 14th of January 1994. Counting the day that it happened as iday onei, day four would be Monday morning January 17th. If these main Signals happen in the in the afternoon or evening the quakes most likely happen the morning of the fourth day. The midway portion of these signals toward sunrise would place the time at 4:27 A.M. The Northridge Quake in 1994 hit at 4:31 A.M. four minutes off the exact dead center. The Kobe, Japan Quake in 1995 gave off the most Main Signals starting the 2nd of January 1995 giving a distinct echo to indicate distance, location, and magnitude killing nearly 6,000 thousand people sixteen days later. If a person that would have listened to Initial Signals and Main Signals like they did back in the early days of radio in Los Angeles: Tune your AM radio down to 530khz and then slowly go up the dial until you have reached a quiet spot in between radio stations with little or no buzz. Next turn the volume up to where there is constant static then turn the volume down until you can barely hear it. You will hear lightning crackling during a storm, lights being turned on and off, or some kinds of electric tools being used. These need to be subtracted from the earthis upward cascading harmonic emissions from the 2-to-12 hertz range. Write down the exact time and dates and you will be hearing these initial and main signals. Don't forget to go about the normal activities of the day. These anomalies will be loud enough that you can hear them at the time they happen even though the volume is low. When the Main Signal is detected an earthquake is in process. There will be a sixteen (16) day window period with three most likely dates, if the quake doesn't happen in the first 24 hours. A good example would be if a Main Signal happened on the 1st of any given month, the window would start on the first (1st) and go through the seventeenth (17th) of that month. The most likeliest dates would be the first, fourth, ninth, and sixteenth (1x1, 2x2, 3x3, 4x4). The time would be based on +/- 9 to 15 hours toward sunrise/sunset and could be either side of the dates mentioned. If a signal happens late at night the following would apply. The 4th and 5th, or 9th and 10th, or the 16th and 17th with the last day being the 18th. Please stay prepared... "All we want to do is save lives" Jack Coles

For References See: AP Wire Service January 17-19th, 1994, Hard Copy, American Journal (Inside Edition January 19, 1994) and the L.A. Weekly News; "The Myth of Solid Ground" April 9-16th, 1999 top of page 34; the Thurston Clarkis book "California Fault" see pages 254-258 and 397-398; along with many other publications for television, radio, and newspaper from Canada to Japan down to Columbia; nationwide in the United States.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: What think you of this? Came in today's email. I am still feeling "earthquakey" - Petra  17:15:01 - 12/21/2004  (23916)  (1)
        ● Re: What think you of this? Came in today's email. I am still feeling "earthquakey" - Cathryn  01:19:49 - 12/22/2004  (23921)  (1)
           ● Re: What think you of this? Came in today's email. I am still feeling "earthquakey" - chris in suburbia  05:29:42 - 12/22/2004  (23922)  (1)
              ● Re: What think you of this? Came in today's email. I am still feeling "earthquakey" - Cathryn  23:11:30 - 12/22/2004  (23937)  (0)