a miss is a miss
Posted by John Vidale on September 03, 2004 at 23:50:05:

Cathryn

A near-miss would suggest KB should adjust the windows, but with time, magnitude, and space to adjust, there are a lot of opportunities for near-misses, and the parameters have already been laid down.

This discussion often arises, and there can be no mercy. Look at how far Jim Berkland was gone with a little wriggle-room (I mean his 90%, 80%, and 70% near misses).

John

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: a miss is a miss - Cathryn  18:01:50 - 9/4/2004  (22720)  (1)
        ● we're working a bit on that - John Vidale  18:28:00 - 9/4/2004  (22723)  (2)
           ● The moon/tidal theory - Cathryn  20:30:17 - 9/4/2004  (22726)  (0)
           ● But my question ... - Cathryn  20:24:15 - 9/4/2004  (22725)  (2)
              ● Re: But my question ... - Roger Hunter  21:48:11 - 9/4/2004  (22729)  (1)
                 ● Re: But my question ... - Cathryn  16:29:13 - 9/5/2004  (22740)  (1)
                    ● P.S. to Roger - Cathryn  17:14:54 - 9/5/2004  (22745)  (1)
                       ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Roger Hunter  21:11:45 - 9/5/2004  (22751)  (1)
                          ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Cathryn  14:51:52 - 9/6/2004  (22765)  (0)
              ● I've no idea - John Vidale  21:03:49 - 9/4/2004  (22727)  (3)
                 ● JOB - Cathryn  16:33:02 - 9/5/2004  (22741)  (1)
                    ● Re: JOB - Cathryn  16:35:46 - 9/5/2004  (22742)  (0)
                 ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn  16:23:25 - 9/5/2004  (22738)  (0)
                 ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn  16:22:58 - 9/5/2004  (22736)  (1)
                    ● More on the books - Cathryn  16:25:28 - 9/5/2004  (22739)  (0)