|
EM signal – Earthquake Web page update |
Over the weekend the following Web page was updated. http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/Data.html 2004/08/10 10:26:14 27.15N 103.87E 10.0 5.1 CHINA The following “Earthquake Data Fingerprint” numbers are also in excellent agreement. The numbers on the left are the most important. To a certain extent they get less important as you move to the right. 23 42 31 66 24 Earthquake The 42 and 43 in the second column are adjusted sublunar point longitudes. They would be the easiest numbers to understand. 23 and 26 in the first column are “Gravity Point” numbers which show where the combined gravitational pulls of the sun and the moon were strongest. 31, 66, 23, and 74 in the third and fourth columns are ocean tide related numbers. 24 and 31 in the fifth column are Solid Earth Tide related numbers. Those numbers are not presently being displayed on that Web page as I am planning on changing the format of the page. Not surprisingly, that China earthquake began appearing in the main Data.html Web page table once it occurred. Prior to that there were other earthquakes listed which were pointing to that area as a possible location for one. For example, my computer program generated the following numbers for the following destructive one: 2003/11/14 18:49:00 27.20N 103.60E 10.0 5.1 YUNAN, CHINA Test Date Pa: Pd: 2004/04/13 55: 58: The Pa: numbers compare EM signals with all 5.0 and greater magnitude earthquakes in my database (about 23,000) which occurred since the beginning of 1990. The Pd: numbers do the same, but compare them with only those earthquakes which produced at least 1 fatality as that 2003/11/14 earthquake did. The 2004/07/16 numbers for that earthquake show an abrupt jump in values. That is probably due in part to the EM signal which was detected on July 11. My Perl language computer program is in my opinion working. And I feel that it is unfortunate that it is not yet in use by governments around the world. If it were then perhaps the people who perished as a result of that China earthquake might have been saved. These are personal opinions. Follow Ups: ● The next generation research computer program is now running - EQF 10:58:27 - 8/27/2004 (22593) (1) ● Reformatted data table for above note - EQF 11:42:45 - 8/27/2004 (22602) (0) ● Additional note - EQF 05:37:02 - 8/23/2004 (22570) (1) ● Experimental - California earthquake data - EQF 11:11:28 - 8/24/2004 (22575) (1) ● Another STUNNING, accurate earthquake forecast – The Olympic earthquake - EQF 10:34:30 - 8/26/2004 (22580) (2) ● Re: Another STUNNING, accurate earthquake forecast – The Olympic earthquake - Canie 18:12:37 - 8/26/2004 (22586) (1) ● Re: Another STUNNING, accurate earthquake forecast – The Olympic earthquake - EQF 01:08:45 - 8/27/2004 (22592) (0) ● Re: Another STUNNING, accurate earthquake forecast – The Olympic earthquake - Todd 17:46:34 - 8/26/2004 (22582) (1) ● Re: Another STUNNING, accurate earthquake forecast – The Olympic earthquake - EQF 01:04:50 - 8/27/2004 (22591) (0) |
|