Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals
Posted by Donald Boon on December 18, 2003 at 16:39:20:

EQF

The ear tone situation is so dizzying that I prefer to ignore it. It tends to magnify itself, and intense signals can drive one crazy. If ENT doctors cannot advise more than ignoring it, who am I to drive myself crazy. One thing I have noticed on myself, however, is that sometimes they are the result of an allergic reaction, and respond to allergy management.

There is no geomagnetic storm in progress at present, according to NOAA's DGD.txt.

I am posting the plus/minus way of following solar electrons and protons and am using the center line in the graph as a starter. I am more concerned about how to show variations in the graph, but it does not show the whole report week.
I am open to suggestion. At the moment it appears obvious that there is no great relationship between them and big earthquakes, as the number of 5M quakes in the past week is about average.

Thanks again for sharing the graph. It provides a lot food for thought, as well as an instant reference.

Donald


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - Donald Boon  19:29:46 - 12/18/2003  (20497)  (1)
        ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - Cathryn  02:09:30 - 12/22/2003  (20533)  (1)
           ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - EQF  05:34:25 - 12/22/2003  (20538)  (1)
              ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - Cathryn  10:05:04 - 12/22/2003  (20546)  (0)
     ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - Petra  19:19:07 - 12/18/2003  (20496)  (0)
     ● Re: Large numbers of Ear Tone signals - EQF  18:32:42 - 12/18/2003  (20495)  (0)