Message segment 4 of 4

That in the theory presented in this article the direction of the earth's magnetic field is connected with the direction of the earth's rotation about itself, provides this experimental opportunity for paleontologists, when they are investigating the magnetic direction of ancient sediments, to search out some indications of the (eastern or western) orientation of rising of the sun in them or in other remainder synchronized marks, frozen in them simultaneous with their magnetic orientation. Anyway, it seems that rising of the sun in the east and its setting in the west have some effects on the earth and its ingredients different from effects caused when the sun is to rise in the west and set in the east. As a rule, this difference should be detectable when investigating the remainder effects.

II. A proposition for determination of ionization energies
----------------------------------------------------------
The above mentioned mechanism by which nature produces the geomagnetic field inspires us to think for a new and perhaps better way to determine the ionization energy of different elements. At present, the first ionization energy of the elements are determined via a method similar to the Franck-Hertz experiment explained in Article 16 of this book. Practical determination of the second and higher ionization energies is not possible by this method and at present they are calculated indirectly by study on the spectrum lines.

It seesms that what has caused the direct determination of ionization energy to be impracticable has neen not only the difficulties to produce such heat enabling the electrons of the atoms to get freed from the atoms, but also the difficulties to detect such a freedom. In other words, when due to extreme heat the electrons has gotten freed from their atoms, how could we understand this freedom of the electrons? If what presented in this article for the cause of the geomagnetic field is true, it seems that we can devise a similar way for detecting separation of the electrons from the atoms when the atoms are such hot to make their electrons free. If we can do this, we shall also have proven experimentally the theory presented in this article for the geomagnetic field.

I think focusing local extreme heat on, eg, a disk-like bounded region full of (the gaseous form of) the element under experiment to such an extent that the electrons of the atoms get freed is possible by our present technology (maybe by lasers, electric discharge, or other manners). If, simultaneous with this, we rotate the disk-like region about its central axis, we should be able to detect production of any magnetic field near the edge of the disk by suitable and sensitive instruments when such a field is being produced due to separation of the electrons because of the extreme heat and their distribution toward the rim of the disk because of their repulsion. The moment we register the presence of a magnetic field is the same moment that separation of the first electrons has occurred and the energy consumed to heat the atoms up should be regitered to calculate the first ionization energy. If we increase our heat, we expect to reach a moment to register an abrupt rise in the magnetic field. That should be the moment of separation of the second electrons. In this manner, practical determination of the second and higher ionization energies of different elements should be possible.

A request
~~~~~~~~~
The author requests the society of science not hesitate to help him to be placed in the main flow of the world physics if really his talent is capable of flourishing widely arousing the motive for many world-wide physical researches and experiments.
Received from
Hamid V. Ansari
Posted by Candlestick