If no one is interested in this "on-topic" material then they will not comment on it...as has been the custom on this web-site.

Please refrain from prejudicially discriminating againt "earth change" topics by discouraging discussion because they may have a religious context or surface disagreement on the issue.

You don't want people to think that because you are a geologist-in-training that you are siding with a Phd geologist (Chris) in attempting to block this type of 'on-topic' material from review...do you?

Your clear bias is shown since obviously volcanic eruptions, lava flows, earthquakes in volcanoes, etc. are all part of the "earth changes" topic and may have some bearing on prediction as well. Any religious context is incidental to the facts published in peer-reviewed journals (from where this information was gathered).

Do I need to indicate further how you have lost your neutrality in deciding what material you are 'discouraging'?

• 'Dormant' volcanoes found to be active