Re: California earthquakes
Posted by EQF on January 12, 2003 at 00:13:56:

Hi Shan, I myself have been suggesting things like that in Newsgroup notices, e-mail reports sent around the world, and Web site reports for at least the past 5 years. If you check the date at the bottom of the following Web page you can see that the original Web site display date was back in 1996.

A Demonstration Earthquake Prediction Program
http://home.netcom.com/~edgrsprj/124.html

And as can be seen at the following Web site, researchers in Japan are apparently monitoring catfish to see what their response is to approaching earthquakes.

http://catfish.ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp/index_en.html

As I have said in the past, I feel that the main problem here is the fact that forecasting earthquakes is simply not high on many priority lists. As a result, logical and important things like what you are proposing are not getting done or are getting done much too slowly.

Follow Ups:
     ● Elephant and Blind Men - R.Shanmugasundaram  14:27:53 - 1/12/2003  (17785)  (1)
        ● Re: Elephant and Blind Men - 2cents  13:38:40 - 1/14/2003  (17791)  (2)
           ● Re: Elephant and Blind Men - R.Shanmugasundaram  03:38:59 - 1/16/2003  (17797)  (1)
              ● Re: Elephant and Blind Men - 2cents  15:52:03 - 1/19/2003  (17805)  (1)
                 ● Re: Elephant and Blind Men - R.Shanmugasundaram  10:40:01 - 1/21/2003  (17825)  (0)
           ● Re: Elephant and Blind Men - EQF  23:19:26 - 1/15/2003  (17795)  (0)
     ● Re: Catfish - Canie  10:20:06 - 1/12/2003  (17784)  (1)
        ● Re: Catfish - EQF  05:04:06 - 1/14/2003  (17790)  (0)