|
Re: flare data-try here |
Actually it's Lowell's idea (or one of his associates). I would suggest just looking at the most powerful flares (x) to see if there is any significance before using the less powerful M flares (etc.). Canie's is right. The column (12th) with the "X" heading is the one to use (with the date on the far left). # Date 10.7cm Number Hemis. Regions Field Flux C M X S 1 2 3 Extracting all X flares events for 2001, we have: An X1 flare on To strip this data just read in the 12th column and if it is > 0 then read the date on the left. These are the start of the X flare 5 day windows. Just taking an eyeball guess real quickly...maybe the number of M7's per year approximately equates to the number of X-class flares per year....hmmmmm. .02
Follow Ups: ● Re: flare data-Goes back to 1995 - 2cents 19:37:51 - 7/29/2002 (16435) (2) ● Re: flare data-Goes back to 1995 - Roger Hunter 19:59:20 - 7/29/2002 (16438) (1) ● Re: flare data-Goes back to 1995 - 2cents 09:10:25 - 8/1/2002 (16450) (0) ● Re: flare data-Goes back to 1995 - chris in suburbia 19:54:30 - 7/29/2002 (16436) (0) |
|