Re: Easter egg winner is....
Posted by low on April 02, 2002 at 17:59:57:

Aha,
I see the problem. CNSS still has no NEIS data from March 31 and precious little
from April 1. Until these area added, it is still too early to call a winner.
Lowell

It is of some interest to me that the Colorado earthquake was a 63% match for
Michael's New Madrid forecast. Since Cathryn's Oklahoma forecast was much
closer to (and less probable) the Texas Panhandle event, I suspect she
has a front line on the win right now, but we will need to wait for that event
to be listed for verification.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Easter egg winner is.... - Roger Hunter  18:03:59 - 4/2/2002  (14521)  (1)
        ● Re: Easter egg winner is.... - Lowell  18:07:00 - 4/2/2002  (14524)  (1)
           ● Re: Easter egg winner is.... - Roger Hunter  19:57:01 - 4/2/2002  (14529)  (1)
              ● Re: Easter egg winner is.... - Lowell  00:18:20 - 4/4/2002  (14564)  (1)
                 ● Re: Easter egg winner is.... - Roger Hunter  04:06:16 - 4/4/2002  (14565)  (2)
                    ● If I force it... - Roger Hunter  04:42:17 - 4/4/2002  (14567)  (1)
                       ● Re: If I force it... - Canie  09:22:51 - 4/4/2002  (14575)  (0)
                    ● That wasn't it. - Roger Hunter  04:34:20 - 4/4/2002  (14566)  (1)
                       ● Re: That wasn't it. - Lowell  08:11:48 - 4/4/2002  (14569)  (1)
                          ● Re: That wasn't it. - Lowell  08:16:34 - 4/4/2002  (14570)  (1)
                             ● Re: That wasn't it. - Roger Hunter  09:25:19 - 4/4/2002  (14576)  (1)
                                ● This is it - Roger Hunter  09:35:09 - 4/4/2002  (14578)  (2)
                                   ● FINALLY! This really IS it! - Roger Hunter  09:47:22 - 4/4/2002  (14581)  (0)
                                   ● Re: This is it - Roger Hunter  09:37:43 - 4/4/2002  (14579)  (0)