|
Prediction Registry needed |
Hi all; Shan's case points up the need for a Prediction Registry here. We're using a standard entry form, we're evaluating the results,but nowhere are we compiling them into a usable Registry so that predictors can establish their credibility. No one wanting to know how reliable someone might be is going to pore thru the archives to find out. I propose that Michael revive his form for that purpose. We need it, with so many getting decent results. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Prediction Registry needed - michael 15:04:44 - 3/30/2002 (14400) (0) ● Re: Prediction Registry needed - Canie 08:46:25 - 3/30/2002 (14384) (1) ● another issue - Roger Hunter 09:20:57 - 3/30/2002 (14385) (3) ● Re: another issue - Lowell 11:56:18 - 3/30/2002 (14392) (1) ● Re: another issue - Roger Hunter 12:28:30 - 3/30/2002 (14395) (0) ● Re: another issue - One approach - 2cents 10:43:32 - 3/30/2002 (14389) (1) ● Re: another issue - One approach - Roger Hunter 11:20:28 - 3/30/2002 (14390) (0) ● Re: another issue - chris in suburbia 09:55:10 - 3/30/2002 (14387) (1) ● Re: another issue - Roger Hunter 10:16:57 - 3/30/2002 (14388) (0) |
|