Lowell;

Here you go.

The quake you reference doesn't fit either one, which doesn't seem right. Can you check this out for me re: distance?

1 . Petra
2002/3 /23 - 2002/3 /29 40.28 -123.8 0 9.9 40 Prob. 79.3%

The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
2002/03/23 16:36:25.15 40.5578 -123.2462 1.88 56.1 Prob. 95.7%
2002/03/23 20:26:08.11 40.1205 -123.7718 1.29 17.9 Prob. 79.3%
2002/03/24 13:01:30.63 40.8002 -124.3438 2.84 73.8 Prob. 98.8%
2002/03/24 13:58:30.42 40.9417 -123.2988 2.05 84.8 Prob. 99.2%
2002/03/24 23:09:40.64 40.7403 -122.5185 2.71 119.7 Prob. 100%
2002/03/25 08:45:18.85 40.3208 -124.4775 2.13 57.6 Prob. 95.7%

Best date 2002/03/25 08:45:18.85 40.3208 -124.4775 2.13 1.5
Best dist 2002/03/23 20:26:08.11 40.1205 -123.7718 1.29 17.881294
Best size 2002/03/24 13:01:30.63 40.8002 -124.3438 2.84 2.84
Best prob 2002/03/23 20:26:08.11 40.1205 -123.7718 1.29 Prob. 79.3%

2 . Don
2002/3 /22 - 2002/3 /26 42.3 -129.9 4 5 35 Prob. 0%

The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.

None found.

So Petra would win but not with the quake in question.

Roger