Re: THIS ONE OUTTA BE CLOSE - tonight's M; 4.6 off the Coast of No. California/Forecasts
Posted by Lowell on March 27, 2002 at 08:11:47:

The reason that this quake is not a match is it is outside the distance boundaries
your program imposes. Allow your distance boundaries to be further for larger earthquakes
and you will find it. It does make some physical sense to allow longer distances for
larger quakes, as they may rupture up to several hundred km of fault segment - far
more than the allowed 3 times the 35 km range limit. No sure how this could (or
should) be done, though. Still, an event of Mb 5 at 110 km from an epicenter on the
date in question is probably a more meaningful fulfillment of a forecast than an
event of 2.5 at 35 km from the forecast epicenter. You're right - the program not
checking this event against Petra or Don's forecast doesn't seem quite right. I am
certain it would have a lower probability than the ones currently listed for Petra.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: THIS ONE OUTTA BE CLOSE - tonight's M; 4.6 off the Coast of No. California/Forecasts - Roger Hunter  08:46:20 - 3/27/2002  (14213)  (1)
        ● Re: THIS ONE OUTTA BE CLOSE - tonight's M; 4.6 off the Coast of No. California/Forecasts - Lowell  08:53:58 - 3/27/2002  (14217)  (1)
           ● NEIS is now listing this event at Mb 4.0 - Lowell  09:00:10 - 3/27/2002  (14219)  (0)
     ● Re: THIS ONE OUTTA BE CLOSE - tonight's M; 4.6 off the Coast of No. California/Forecasts - Lowell  08:45:47 - 3/27/2002  (14212)  (2)
        ● limitation factor - Roger Hunter  09:57:44 - 3/27/2002  (14220)  (2)
           ● limits needed for hits - Roger Hunter  10:24:01 - 3/27/2002  (14227)  (1)
              ● Re: limits needed for hits - Lowell  10:39:44 - 3/27/2002  (14231)  (2)
                 ● here ya go! - Roger Hunter  11:10:36 - 3/27/2002  (14243)  (1)
                    ● Re: here ya go! - Lowell  11:12:56 - 3/27/2002  (14245)  (0)
                 ● Re: limits needed for hits - Lowell  10:47:11 - 3/27/2002  (14237)  (2)
                    ● Re: limits needed for hits - Roger Hunter  10:56:48 - 3/27/2002  (14241)  (1)
                       ● Flinn-Engdahl Regions - Lowell  11:45:38 - 3/27/2002  (14254)  (0)
                    ● Re: limits needed for hits - Canie  10:53:07 - 3/27/2002  (14240)  (0)
           ● Re: limitation factor - Lowell  10:20:23 - 3/27/2002  (14224)  (0)
        ● Re: THIS ONE OUTTA BE CLOSE - tonight's M; 4.6 off the Coast of No. California/Forecasts - Roger Hunter  08:49:03 - 3/27/2002  (14215)  (0)