Here are the latest results.

The relative standings have not changed but the gap has narrowed a bit.

But an interesting situation has come up.

The "best-fitting" quake is not the least probable quake.

I define "best fit" as closest to the midpoint of time and location and largest mag. within the outer time and space limits. In this case, a quake closer to the date center was found which has a higher probability than one further out.

Now it seems to me that anything inside the predicted ranges is a hit for that parameter. Closer to center is an arbitrary choice on my part to make decisions easier.

Does anyone wish to contest that choice? Should I find the least probable quake within the hits? Or would that be data selection too?

What seems fair to you?

Roger