Re: ANSWERS for your questions
Posted by Kate on March 15, 2002 at 08:24:16:

Hi EQF. I have no idea why you continue to go on and on about being addressed as EQF. Especially since I opened my response to you by addressing you as EQF. It's a real waste of time at this point and quite frankly it's getting more and more difficult to take you seriously.

Having said that, you talk alot but show nothing useful for the purposes of this bulletin board. I could make a web page and list lots of damaging earthquakes and I could do it after the fact. If you are going to continually post on THIS bulletin board and talk about the fact that you have all this proof, you will be speaking to deaf ears. As I stated intially, you will have to post to THIS bulletin board PRIOR to these damaging quakes. You will have to state where, when, and how big. It will take you MUCH less time to do that than to come here and ramble on about your guidelines for safety and copyright this and that. If you provide this proof elsewhere on the internet, I suggest that you discuss it there. If you want to discuss it here and be taken seriously, you will have to provide the proof here BEFORE the quakes occur. It seems pretty simple to me. If you have the capability, demonstrate it. Take Care.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - EQF  01:52:19 - 3/16/2002  (13759)  (1)
        ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Kate  08:44:50 - 3/16/2002  (13771)  (1)
           ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - EQF  01:12:43 - 3/17/2002  (13813)  (1)
              ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn  01:45:06 - 3/17/2002  (13814)  (1)
                 ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Canie  21:12:40 - 3/17/2002  (13859)  (1)
                    ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn  16:22:33 - 3/18/2002  (13908)  (0)