|
Re: ANSWERS for your questions |
Hi EQF. I hear what you are saying. I guess I'm confused about why you wouldn't post because you aren't being paid to do so. Wouldn't saving lives be payment enough? Don't answer that. I'm done with this thread. My main point was that for people here to believe that you make accurate forecasts for damaging quakes that we would need to have proof just like anyone else. Otherwise we are being expected to believe without proof and I'm sure you know that doesn't go over too well. Good luck with your efforts. Follow Ups: ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - EQF 01:12:43 - 3/17/2002 (13813) (1) ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn 01:45:06 - 3/17/2002 (13814) (1) ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Canie 21:12:40 - 3/17/2002 (13859) (1) ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn 16:22:33 - 3/18/2002 (13908) (0) |
|