Re: ANSWERS for your questions
Posted by Kate on March 16, 2002 at 08:44:50:

Hi EQF. I hear what you are saying. I guess I'm confused about why you wouldn't post because you aren't being paid to do so. Wouldn't saving lives be payment enough? Don't answer that. I'm done with this thread. My main point was that for people here to believe that you make accurate forecasts for damaging quakes that we would need to have proof just like anyone else. Otherwise we are being expected to believe without proof and I'm sure you know that doesn't go over too well. Good luck with your efforts.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - EQF  01:12:43 - 3/17/2002  (13813)  (1)
        ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn  01:45:06 - 3/17/2002  (13814)  (1)
           ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Canie  21:12:40 - 3/17/2002  (13859)  (1)
              ● Re: ANSWERS for your questions - Cathryn  16:22:33 - 3/18/2002  (13908)  (0)