Re: Evaluation question
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 12, 2002 at 19:07:08:

Michael;

We are in general agreement. Of course a 3 is not treated the same as an 8 but I think the probability calculation will take care of that.

But there's no way a quake 3 years late will be called a hit.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell  22:33:49 - 3/12/2002  (13635)  (2)
        ● Re: Evaluation question - michael  16:41:49 - 3/13/2002  (13674)  (0)
        ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter  04:40:58 - 3/13/2002  (13646)  (1)
           ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell  07:07:36 - 3/13/2002  (13651)  (1)
              ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter  07:54:25 - 3/13/2002  (13654)  (0)