Re: What about Don's Petrolia prediction
Posted by Petra Challus on November 10, 2001 at 20:27:36:

Hi Lowell,

While you may not be of a mind to accept that ear tones are related to earthquakes, I think having only had two ear tones of late and both of them were followed by quakes within the magnitude range I expected after hearing them and the correct North/South directions, I think you should grant me a little latitude in this thing.

Though they could not in the widest sense be considered a "hit", they are an interesting anomoly. Nothing anyone will ever say will ever sway me from my ground on this issue at any time, or any day of the week.

So though greatly irritated over this endeavor of three years I will say this about that, I shall continue to give Don my data on the larger events, but as for posting about them, today and henceforth I am going to do what I should have done years ago, take the vow of silence.

I cannot wrap this in shiny paper, put it into a pitrie dish or set it in stone and thus it is more of a frustration than anything else. So I will leave it to Don to package it neatly in a scientific method and let him do with it as he thinks best. I am frankly sick of it.

Amen....Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Misunderstood my intentions - Lowell  14:18:41 - 11/11/2001  (10839)  (1)
        ● Ear tones - EQF  15:05:40 - 11/11/2001  (10840)  (2)
           ● Re: Ear tones - 2cents  23:29:41 - 11/12/2001  (10879)  (1)
              ● Re: Ear tones - EQF  01:57:14 - 11/13/2001  (10883)  (0)
           ● Re: Ear tones - Cathryn  19:12:28 - 11/11/2001  (10844)  (1)
              ● Re: Ear tones - Petra Challus  19:40:24 - 11/11/2001  (10848)  (1)
                 ● Re: Ear tones - Lowell  23:58:04 - 11/11/2001  (10854)  (1)
                    ● Same here (NT) - Cathryn  10:30:17 - 11/12/2001  (10865)  (0)