Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms
Posted by 2cents on November 05, 2001 at 22:54:40:

Nice report & some Q's:

And how are signal interferences determined (i.e. confirm actual ground motion versus "ghost" noise signals showing) ? (I think this was brought up before).

& What's significance of first up/down motion. From msg awhile back...shouldn't they all be first down motions....?

& what's the story line on the timing of the event on the sun versus the earth...i.e. how is the "no delay" explained ?


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Lowell  01:36:07 - 11/6/2001  (10738)  (1)
        ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents  23:01:47 - 11/6/2001  (10754)  (2)
           ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter  05:48:53 - 11/7/2001  (10758)  (1)
              ● Thx Roger Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents  08:17:26 - 11/7/2001  (10759)  (1)
                 ● Re: Thx Roger Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter  09:50:22 - 11/7/2001  (10763)  (0)
           ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Lowell  23:55:32 - 11/6/2001  (10757)  (1)
              ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents  08:24:09 - 11/7/2001  (10760)  (1)
                 ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter  09:54:17 - 11/7/2001  (10764)  (0)