|
Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) |
Hi Roger: It does to the extent that one can get a general idea which direction the waves are coming from. I'm trying to figure out how to make it an exact science, say at point "A" on a given fault, what direction are the waves coming from? Knowing this, and the orientation of the fault at a given point, one could calculate an 'angle of attack' from 0 to 90 degrees. It's probably just math, and I think I have the formula somewhere .... it would be neat to assign an orientation for fault segments into a database and when a large EQ occurs, compare the incoming waves against each fault segment, to figure out which are most at risk.... Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell 16:49:43 - 11/3/2001 (10665) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter 19:03:36 - 10/31/2001 (10558) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Don In Hollister 16:19:42 - 10/31/2001 (10556) (1) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - michael 12:15:21 - 11/1/2001 (10571) (2) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell 16:52:48 - 11/3/2001 (10666) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter 12:31:33 - 11/1/2001 (10573) (0) |
|