Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01)
Posted by michael on October 31, 2001 at 15:46:39:

Hi Roger:

It does to the extent that one can get a general idea which direction the waves are coming from. I'm trying to figure out how to make it an exact science, say at point "A" on a given fault, what direction are the waves coming from? Knowing this, and the orientation of the fault at a given point, one could calculate an 'angle of attack' from 0 to 90 degrees. It's probably just math, and I think I have the formula somewhere .... it would be neat to assign an orientation for fault segments into a database and when a large EQ occurs, compare the incoming waves against each fault segment, to figure out which are most at risk....

Michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell  16:49:43 - 11/3/2001  (10665)  (0)
     ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter  19:03:36 - 10/31/2001  (10558)  (0)
     ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Don In Hollister  16:19:42 - 10/31/2001  (10556)  (1)
        ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - michael  12:15:21 - 11/1/2001  (10571)  (2)
           ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell  16:52:48 - 11/3/2001  (10666)  (0)
           ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter  12:31:33 - 11/1/2001  (10573)  (0)