Re: Energy Islands – May 1, 2013
Posted by Skywise on May 03, 2013 at 17:03:12:

The concept of aluminum as a fuel is new to me, so can't really comment on that one with any certainty, but hydrogen is a joke. The energy density of liquid hydrogen is only 8.5 MJ/L (megajoules per liter). Compare to gasoline at 34.2 MJ/L. There's actually more hydrogen in gasoline than there is in LH2, per volume.

Although aluminum is 83.8 MJ/L, it's weight becomes an issue, as 'light' as it is. But, I'm concerned that an 'aluminum energy cycle' can't become viable unless it is introduced on a massive scale from the get go. I suspect the fixed energy costs to initiate the process are too high and would far offset the benefit, resulting in a net loss.

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics can be a real beach, eh?

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Aluminum - Skywise  01:07:42 - 5/5/2013  (100569)  (1)
        ● Re: Aluminum - Roger Hunter  12:26:03 - 5/5/2013  (100572)  (2)
           ● Re: Aluminum - EQF  02:49:13 - 5/7/2013  (100575)  (1)
              ● Re: Aluminum - Roger Hunter  08:35:13 - 5/7/2013  (100576)  (1)
                 ● Re: Aluminum - EQF  07:53:36 - 5/8/2013  (100577)  (1)
                    ● Re: Aluminum - Skywise  16:15:36 - 5/8/2013  (100579)  (1)
                       ● Proposed Foundation - May 11, 2013 - EQF  01:31:14 - 5/11/2013  (100583)  (0)
           ● Re: Aluminum - Skywise  01:30:59 - 5/6/2013  (100573)  (0)