|
something is wrong |
Roger, that is not fair to the point of being ridiculous: to expect 99% before saying someone beats chance. Where I say something is wrong is: how could Amit beat random 92% compared of the time? He should get 50% (or maybe 40 to 60%). This is not a tiny amount of predictions we are talking about. Whether the method does not ake sense or not should have nothing to do with the statistical evaluation. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: something is wrong - Roger Hunter 09:03:33 - 1/20/2013 (100158) (1) ● Re: something is wrong - AMIT 10:47:14 - 1/20/2013 (100159) (1) ● Re: something is wrong - Roger Hunter 12:01:43 - 1/20/2013 (100160) (2) ● Re: something is wrong - Amit 20:11:33 - 1/20/2013 (100163) (2) ● Re: something is wrong - Roger Hunter 20:19:05 - 1/20/2013 (100166) (0) ● Re: something is wrong - Roger Hunter 20:18:42 - 1/20/2013 (100165) (0) ● Re: Amit; passing grade - Roger Hunter 12:29:20 - 1/20/2013 (100161) (1) ● Re: Amit; passing grade - Amit 19:59:53 - 1/20/2013 (100162) (1) ● Re: Amit; passing grade - Roger Hunter 20:14:48 - 1/20/2013 (100164) (0) ● Re: something is wrong - Amit 08:37:16 - 1/20/2013 (100156) (0) |
|