12-30-2014, 10:27 PM
I recently discovered that one of our residents has unknowingly helped debunk a UFO conspiracy theory.
Someone noticed an underwater structure off the Malibu coast using Google Earth, and decided it was an underwater UFO base because it couldn't possibly be a natural formation. It's too perfectly oval and flat topped, and has supporting columns on one side, and it's too close to a military naval base.
Fact is, the columns are an artifact of the low resolution bathymetry data being interpolated by the software. I recognized it immediately from my own experience playing with GIS software and digital elevation models.
But what does Chris have to do with all of this? I was listening to the Coast to Coast AM show the other night and one of the guests is a newspaper journalist who wrote about the theory. He pointed out a paper published by GSA that shows the area was studied and already known. And named... Sycamore Knoll.
A link to the paper was provided and it turned out to be,
Potential earthquake faults offshore Southern California,
from the eastern Santa Barbara Channel south to Dana Point
- Fisher, Sorlien, Sliter, 2009.
Here's a link to the newspaper article.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/19...93186.html
In the article is a link to the paper. In the paper, the authors conducted seismic reflection surveys, and one survey line runs right across the knoll. Clearly, it's a natural structure.
So is Chris going add "UFO Theory Debunker" to his CV?
Brian
Someone noticed an underwater structure off the Malibu coast using Google Earth, and decided it was an underwater UFO base because it couldn't possibly be a natural formation. It's too perfectly oval and flat topped, and has supporting columns on one side, and it's too close to a military naval base.
Fact is, the columns are an artifact of the low resolution bathymetry data being interpolated by the software. I recognized it immediately from my own experience playing with GIS software and digital elevation models.
But what does Chris have to do with all of this? I was listening to the Coast to Coast AM show the other night and one of the guests is a newspaper journalist who wrote about the theory. He pointed out a paper published by GSA that shows the area was studied and already known. And named... Sycamore Knoll.
A link to the paper was provided and it turned out to be,
Potential earthquake faults offshore Southern California,
from the eastern Santa Barbara Channel south to Dana Point
- Fisher, Sorlien, Sliter, 2009.
Here's a link to the newspaper article.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/19...93186.html
In the article is a link to the paper. In the paper, the authors conducted seismic reflection surveys, and one survey line runs right across the knoll. Clearly, it's a natural structure.
So is Chris going add "UFO Theory Debunker" to his CV?
Brian