Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
01-01-2015, 02:09 PM
Brian and all,
I just found the links. The Supplemental animations are at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...2/suppinfo
The paper is at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...03632/full
Open Access!
OK, to answer your question, yes, I/we convert our two-way time work to depth. The stills from the supplemental animation below are in depth, 5 km scale, no vertical exaggeration. These days, I/we have been making 3D velocity models so that we can convert everything to depth, including the seismic reflection data. For Santa Barbara Channel and offshore south-central California, there are a lot of petroleum test wells with velocity surveys. For offshore Istanbul, there was dense seismic refraction. For offshore San Diego, we used the Community velocity model, Harvard U., which there must be based on processing of multichannel seismic reflection data. I will use the last for Ross Sea.
OK, let me try to upload the .jpg I just made:
I just found the links. The Supplemental animations are at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...2/suppinfo
The paper is at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...03632/full
Open Access!
OK, to answer your question, yes, I/we convert our two-way time work to depth. The stills from the supplemental animation below are in depth, 5 km scale, no vertical exaggeration. These days, I/we have been making 3D velocity models so that we can convert everything to depth, including the seismic reflection data. For Santa Barbara Channel and offshore south-central California, there are a lot of petroleum test wells with velocity surveys. For offshore Istanbul, there was dense seismic refraction. For offshore San Diego, we used the Community velocity model, Harvard U., which there must be based on processing of multichannel seismic reflection data. I will use the last for Ross Sea.
OK, let me try to upload the .jpg I just made: