[Roger Hunter]

(11-17-2015, 02:41 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(11-16-2015, 03:21 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: Yes I did. This current program relates to Amit Dave's predictions which are based on similar ideas.

I don't know how to describe the program logic any better than I already did but it does seem the have a bug or two somewhere.

Roger

I want to show that 127/128 degrees is due to the size of the ring of fire as Brian suggested.

The only thing I can think of is a map for each main quake with the rings and quakes plotted.
This may work visually but doesn't give anything for numerical analysis.

Anyone have a better idea?

Roger

Found the error.

In counting all quakes for a year I was counting the same quakes repeatedly since mag 7.5+ quakes happen frequently.

I changed the program to restart at each new main quake and now the numbers are as expected. The largest number is at 0 degrees. The next largest is at 62 degrees and they taper off from there.

I tried maps but just can't get the code right. I'm trying to plot a Mercator projection centered on the main quake's longitude but it just isn't working.

Getting old I guess....

Roger