Hi Petra,

> Don was telling me you had a butte of a headache >last week and I think you probably already know
> most sensitives have headaches before
>earthquakes.

I know a lot of them do. I've never been able to coordinate mine with any of them. And yes, it was a whopper. He called in the middle of it and I had to actually excuse myself from our conversation and go back to bed. He kept laughing like I was kidding. Sadly, no.

>Kathy Gori of course is a living model with a
>record of 85%. Not bad.

I've heard claims to this effect, but IMHO her parameters are pretty loose so it's hard to judge.

>I've had more headaches in the past four days than >I've had in years and boy are they disconcerting.

First, I'm so sorry. Not fun. Second, do you think they correlate to "Deep, Dark, and Ugly?"

>I think I'm going to have to pay attention to them >as much as ear tones because of what I've seen in
> other sensitives.

Yes, I would if yours have taken a sudden spike. It would be interesting if you saw a correlation between your headaches and your ear tones. I hear tones quite regularly but have never been able to link what I hear to any any seismic activity, so I would have to rule out both tones and headaches (in my case) as a means of prognostication.

>My living very close to the RCF may indeed be
>changing my sensitivities.

Could be.

>Anyway, let me return to Deep, Dark and Ugly. I
>never posted the sound here because it was so
>ominous I was afraid I'd cause widespead panic if >I did. All I can say is that it is at least as far >away as Parkfield, very deep in the earth and one >huge earthquake. I can only hope its going to
>arrive where no one lives because survival would
>be limited at best.

Mind a few questions?

When did you hear this sound?
Any reliable sense of its direction from your location?
Does your radius extend northward and eastward as far as southward?
Can you pinpoint any certain fault?
Do you know it is far from you as opposed to local?
Any sense of time frame or magnitude?

>In making a general overall statement about
>prediction as a whole, what I hope to see in the >future, which does occur on a minor scale between >Don and I at times, is a bridge between what a
>sensitive hears, feels or senses and the physical >matter of streamed data so a closer target can be >determined beforehand. I'm not ready at this point >to say it cannot be done, it just needs more hands >at the wheel on both sides to be achieved.

That seems to be the goal; the missing link between feeling and measurable scientific data.

Scary about that key-in-the-door business. Hope you feel better today.

Cathryn