Hi Mark,

No surprises here. You see over two years ago Mary/Maya, myself and a whole list of sensitives were posting here daily. We also had a scorekeeper named Ken who lived in Santa Cruz. He never revealed to any of us who was the most accurate, which kept things on a level playing field. But I'll tell you, the sensitives were primarily in the Bay Area and little would have escaped this ear tone group.

While we did not use scientific methods as ear tones don't usually fall within those catagories, we did get "hits" on a regular basis. The quake I heard in the Queen Charlottes would have been considered a hit because the area would not have been so defined as a 75 mile radius of Bremerton, for instance.

In the larger sense I think I will most likely be disappointed repeatedly trying to fit this human condition into a scientific format. As I explained to Don yesterday, it is often two or three seconds before I am fully aware of an ear tone. When measuring mileage at 37 miles per second as we have narrowed it down, then I've lost my ability to count the seconds correctly. But I am pleased to narrow the distance down by some method, which previously was not possible. This was achieved by hearing the sound of the Olympia EQ 2 1/2 hours before it occurred. It is a true milestone in ear tone use.

Insofar as EQ Tracker goes, they measure within a 20 mile radius of the area in question, which was determined by asking Tom who runs EQ tracker.

I think the only way to look at this right now is that it is in R & D and needs much work. The most promising outlook would be to recall those sensitives that were previously members and work together as we did before, however, today that is not possible. Oh well.

Thanks so much for taking your valuable time to have a look see on your own. It surely brightens my spirits.

Petra