|
|
|
Evaluation of Don's Mt. St. Helen's prediction
|
Posted by Lowell on September 29, 2001 at 19:01:37:
Evaluation of Don's Mt. St. Helen's forecast On Sept. 20, Don made the following forecast (#9545 below) for the Mt. St. Helen's region: "Mount St. Helens, Washington Earthquake Forecast Posted by Don In Hollister on September 20, 2001 at 00:48:38: Magnitude: 2.0-3.6 From: 09/21/2001PDT - To: 09/26/2001PDT Location: Mount St. Helens, Washington Lat: 46.2N - Long: 122.2W - Range: 40Km" Since the time window has now passed, this forecast can be evaluated. PNSN identified the following events within the 40 km radius that Don had declared in the past past week: ML 2.1 2001/09/28 23:44:58 46.4N 122.2W 17 km S of Morton, WA ML 1.5 2001/09/25 11:03:25 46.2N 122.2W 0 km NE of Mount St. Helens ML 1.3 2001/09/24 17:52:56 46.2N 122.2W 0 km NE of Mount St. Helens ML 1.8 2001/09/24 00:12:11 46.2N 122.2W 1 km NE of Mount St. Helens Source: http://www.geophys.washington.edu/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes0.html A swarm of smaller events has also occurred in the Mount St. Helens vicinity including nearly 100 events of Ml<1.0. The forecast, however was clearly not for a small event, but for something in the Ml 2-3.6 range. While the event on 24 Sept. matched all parameters of Don's prediction, it was not in the stated magnitude range. In my opinion, in region of high microseismicity, it is important for a forecast event to lie in the given magnitude range as well as within an acceptable time of the forecast window. The first 3 events and the accompanying swarm did not fall in the magnitude window, and while the swarm was uncommon for Mt. St. Helen's at this time, I do not believe it can be considered a match for Don's prediction. The earthquake last night S. of Morton, however is another matter. While 2 days outside the time window, it was in the magnitude and location range (being about 22 km from the predicted epicenter). In the case of such a small event, it is particularly necessary, however to check the probability of random occurrence within the time frame. In Don's area (40 km of 46.2N 122.6W) there have been 10 earthquake with Ml between 2.0 and 3.6 in the past year - about 1 every 36 days. The past several months, however, have been quiet in the region with the ony event of Ml>=2 in the region occurring on August 6 (Ml 2.4). Prior to that, there had been none since May 8, 2001. Earthquakes larger than last night's occurred on Aug 6 (Ml 2.4); Apr 24 (Ml 2.3) Mar 17 (Ml 2.5) and Oct 10, 2000 (Ml 2.2). The event of March 17 was the largest in the region in the past year (Ml 2.5). From this background, the daily chance over the past year of the occurrence of an earthquake of Ml 2.0-3.6 in the 40 km radius area was 10/365 = 0.027. In the stated 6-day period, the chance was 0.16 (about odds of 1 in 7), in the observed 8-day period from the initial day of the forecast to the event, the odds of success were about 1 in 5. By random chance Don should not have had a success on this one in more than one in five tries. Not a bad forecast given the Ml 1.8 which occurred in the middle of the time window, and the Ml 2.1 which occurred 2 days outside it. I'd give this a B+, mostly because the probability of random success is fairly high compared with other predictions Don has made.
|
|
|