Posted by Lowell on September 09, 2001 at 17:38:56:
ichael, This was not an insignificant earthquake for that area of Southern California. The last event in the region 34-35N 118-119W which was larger occurred as an aftershock to the Northridge earthquake on 27 April 1997, more than 4 years ago. The last earthquake of similar size in this area occurred on Jan 14, 2001 (Ml 4.2). I might add that this is near the boundary of the Santa Clarita prediction Don had made in late August. In that forecast, he had noted: "The magnitude is 2.5Md to 3.7Md. However in the event of a geomagnetic storm on or about 08/29/2001, or a hurricane on the east coast the magnitude could be greater. As to how much greater is the tricky part. I would say that at the max it shouldn't be over a 5.7Md. More likely around 4.7Md." The suggestion was that a large earthquake in the area would be dependent on solar/geomagnetic effects. The Space Environment Center (SEC) observed a M9.5 (nearly an X-class) flare this afternoon. This flare was the largest since an X5.3 on August 25, 2001 and the largest since Don posted this prediction. The parameters of today's flare from SEC are: Flare # BEGIN MAX END CLASS 2160 + 2040 2045 2048 M9.5 See: http://sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/indices/events/20010909events.txt and http://sec.noaa.gov/today.html Recall that a Ml 2.9 did occur in Don's predicted area in the time frame of his prediction. There has been a series of smaller earthquakes in the area since then, however, so this appears to be a continuation of that series. You might also recall that the area West of Los Angeles was specifically noted in the far-field forecast from the Pacific-Antarctic Rise of 2 September as a region where far-field triggering was to be expected. That forecast had stated: " Local areas in the U.S. which may experience a regionally significant or moderate quake or increased activity: (Expected maximum magnitudes increase by 0.5 units) Southern California 115-119.5W 32-35N A section between 34-36N from Virginia, New Madrid, Arizona, Southern California" and " In the United States seismic events in Southern California ond off the coast of Northern California in the Mendocino area often follow earthquake in this area of the Pacific." and "Areas where the wave-front is parallel to the local faulting have experienced large events following earthquakes in this region of the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge. These areas include the Central American/Mexican subduction zone, the portion of the San Andreas running from about 116W to 119W in So. California," This board has discussed these possibilities in several posts since that time. California earthquake listings (There have been several aftershocks) http://www.scecdc.scec.org/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes0.html
Follow Ups:
● Re: West Hollwood Earthquake FELT! - Canie 20:29:31 - 9/9/2001 (9388) (1)
● Out of Town - michael 21:53:59 - 9/9/2001 (9391) (0)
● Re: West Hollwood Earthquake FELT! - Todd 17:45:47 - 9/9/2001 (9383) (1)
● Santa Momica Fault NT - michael 18:18:33 - 9/9/2001 (9385) (1)
● Or should I say, Santa Monica Fault NT (darned keyboard!) - michael 18:19:25 - 9/9/2001 (9386) (1)
● Re: Or should I say, Santa Monica Fault NT (darned keyboard!) - Cathryn 18:59:17 - 9/9/2001 (9387) (1)
● Subway - michael 21:52:59 - 9/9/2001 (9390) (2)
● Thanks, Michael (NT) - Cathryn 14:05:43 - 9/10/2001 (9398) (0)
● Re: Subway - Billion Watts 07:29:20 - 9/10/2001 (9395) (1)
● Re: Subway - michael 08:53:52 - 9/10/2001 (9396) (0)
|