|
|
|
|
| Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 |
Fair enough. But as I have said elsewhere, for an earthquake as large as 7 you should get a huge signal compared to what you get for a 4. Without knowing what your instrument or signal physically is, it's hard to suggest any reason why this might not happen. Follow Ups: ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Al in Long Beach 12:42:40 - 10/20/1999 (900510) (2) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Roger Musson 08:16:21 - 10/21/1999 (900566) (0) ● electromagnetic signals - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 13:15:27 - 10/20/1999 (900512) (1) ● Re: electromagnetic signals - Al in Long Beach 01:47:51 - 10/21/1999 (900552) (1) ● Re: electromagnetic signals - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 11:26:04 - 10/21/1999 (900578) (0) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 09:08:58 - 10/20/1999 (900488) (1) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Roger Musson 08:29:46 - 10/21/1999 (900567) (1) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:26:56 - 10/21/1999 (900575) (1) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:47:51 - 10/21/1999 (900576) (2) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Roger Musson 03:02:48 - 10/22/1999 (900620) (1) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 09:55:45 - 10/22/1999 (900621) (0) ● Re: Thinking back prior to 10/17/99 - Dyan 16:33:24 - 10/21/1999 (900590) (0) |
|
|
|
|
