|
Re: Update for Tuesday - signals this evening - Wed morning |
Thanks Joan. The M4.0 up that far away from me is really to small for my primary to pick up so it has still yet to occur. This morning the signal did come in for a few seconds, but not continual like it did last night. What was coming in this morning was two signals for smaller quakes. One an M4.0 +/- .7 if within 100 miles and an M3.5 +/- .7 if within 100 miles of my location. So we shall see. I see Pat appears to be sensing this as well and I think Stargzr was/is as well. Since the signal only came in for a few seconds this morning, this quake will either be out in the desert areas or maybe down of the coast by San Clemente or it could be the area south of Yuma reawakening. Another potential area is for a very large quake up in the Komandorsky region seeing all the activity that its been having lately. All of these possibilities are if this isn't from Northern California. Almost forgot to mention that secondaries were active this morning but only very lightly, but widespread. So the signals from my primary this morning seem to fit in with the secondary activity this morning. Dennis Follow Ups: ● Wed evening update - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 20:15:34 - 9/29/1999 (900167) (2) ● Re: Thursday update - d.pope@IX.Netcom.com 16:29:39 - 9/30/1999 (900185) (1) ● Re: Thursday update - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 16:54:39 - 9/30/1999 (900189) (1) ● Re: Thursday update - Diane 20:17:37 - 9/30/1999 (900192) (1) ● Re: Thursday update - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 09:25:11 - 10/1/1999 (900212) (1) ● Re: Thursday update - Diane 14:36:46 - 10/1/1999 (900218) (0) ● Re: Wed evening update - Char 20:36:09 - 9/29/1999 (900168) (1) ● Re: Wed morning update - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:04:19 - 9/30/1999 (900175) (0) |
|