|
|
|
you're hopeless
|
Posted by John Vidale on December 21, 2012 at 12:39:35:
"Geologists frequently demand that an acceptable earthquake forecast specify exact location, time window, and magnitude information, all at the same time." After all these years, you still can't grasp that these are the three quantities necessary for a "prediction" to be a functional prediction. Sure, you can say the quake will be somewhere in the solar system, and some magnitude between -100 and +100, and between 1am and 2am your local Albanian standard time, but then the prediction is weak, and may be evaluated in that context. Requiring time, magnitude, and location in a prediction is akin to specifying x, y, and z in a location. It is the immutable physics. And yet another claim to be a professional this and a professional that - the fact is you don't use your identity, and nothing you've posted here reveals more skill to be greater than a good high school student. Argument by assertion doesn't work in science, but then your postings are not science.
|
|
|