|
Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 |
Penny (and Amit), I'll disagree a little bit. If Amit was getting predictions at high statistical significance, then it would be interesting from the point of view of earthquake processes. Plus, Amit's predictions are really easy to evaluate, unlike others. But, I'm pretty sure Roger has done this and there is no significance. So of no use. Roger, correct me if I am wrong. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - PennyB 12:58:14 - 11/30/2012 (80662) (0) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Roger Hunter 10:48:53 - 11/29/2012 (80655) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Amit 06:40:20 - 12/1/2012 (80665) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Roger Hunter 09:50:13 - 12/1/2012 (80667) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Amit 21:58:59 - 12/1/2012 (80671) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Roger Hunter 22:05:22 - 12/1/2012 (80672) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Amit 22:53:47 - 12/1/2012 (80675) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Roger Hunter 07:55:41 - 12/2/2012 (80680) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Amit 09:41:00 - 12/3/2012 (80693) (1) ● Re: Earthquake prediction for December 2012 - Roger Hunter 10:56:59 - 12/3/2012 (80696) (1) ● Amit is making sense here - Island Chris 06:18:42 - 12/14/2012 (80783) (0) |
|