|
Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 |
I know this post will probably be met with much derision, considering who I'm responding to, that it's entirely off topic for this forum, that it is a highly controversial subject (politics), and that it seems most people don't care for what I have to say anyway. Oh darn! You cannot spend money that you don't have. That's a fact and not an opinion. Anyone who doesn't get that is part of the problem and not the solution. If I have to explain, you probably wouldn't get it until it hits you over the head like a ton of bricks, which the way things are going is probably what's going to happen. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter 12:53:50 - 11/7/2012 (80517) (2) ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Skywise 17:07:31 - 11/7/2012 (80520) (1) ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter 17:19:24 - 11/7/2012 (80521) (1) ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Skywise 18:27:27 - 11/7/2012 (80522) (1) ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter 19:09:08 - 11/7/2012 (80523) (0) ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - EQF 14:10:18 - 11/7/2012 (80519) (0) |
|