Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012
Posted by Skywise on November 07, 2012 at 12:40:36:

I know this post will probably be met with much derision, considering who I'm responding to, that it's entirely off topic for this forum, that it is a highly controversial subject (politics), and that it seems most people don't care for what I have to say anyway. Oh darn!

You cannot spend money that you don't have. That's a fact and not an opinion.

Anyone who doesn't get that is part of the problem and not the solution.

If I have to explain, you probably wouldn't get it until it hits you over the head like a ton of bricks, which the way things are going is probably what's going to happen.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter  12:53:50 - 11/7/2012  (80517)  (2)
        ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Skywise  17:07:31 - 11/7/2012  (80520)  (1)
           ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter  17:19:24 - 11/7/2012  (80521)  (1)
              ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Skywise  18:27:27 - 11/7/2012  (80522)  (1)
                 ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - Roger Hunter  19:09:08 - 11/7/2012  (80523)  (0)
        ● Re: The 2012 U.S. Election Outcome and Its Implications For Science - November 7, 2012 - EQF  14:10:18 - 11/7/2012  (80519)  (0)